Wednesday, March 20, 2013

PLE #9

How might self-efficacy and self-regulation contribute to the intervention plans you use in your case study?

If Luke felt he had high self efficacy in his subjects then he would be less likely to act out, and more motivated to pay attention. I would plan to use interventions with the goal of raising his self efficacy. As his self efficacy rises Luke would also be more likely to self regulate. Self-regulation would be extremely important for Luke to learn. It is hard to learn when you don't set goals for yourself or if you are not intrinsically motivated. 

The ability to self-regulate is not only important for learning, but is also important in life. The marshmallow test is just one example of how setting goals and learning to work towards those goals can be important. It also shows how some children posses this ability and others do not.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

PLE post #8

This is your first week as an educational interpreter at Brown Elementary School. One of your students, Luke, has completely shut down and is not engaged in learning. During instruction, he refuses to look at you for communication. He has not completed any assignments that would help him demonstrate an understanding of material and has, on several occasions, put his head down on his desk and gone to sleep. On the second day of school, you tried to talk to Luke between classes to find out if there was a problem and he walked away from you. Yesterday, when you attempted to facilitate communication with his math teacher, Luke crossed his arms and turned his back toward you. His math teacher got angry and requested that you contact his parents, who are both hearing, and set up a meeting to discuss Luke’s behavior.

Based on a behaviorists understanding of cognitive development, conditioning would be beneficial for this student, particularly positive reinforcement and removal punishment. Because the behavior is already occurring removal punishment, such as taking away time at an activity that Luke likes to do, would be effective. This could lead him to become more isolated, however, if that event is social in nature. For this reason I would think that positive reinforcement would work better over all. This could be done by finding out something Luke likes, such as candy or computer time, and giving that to him if he does actions like paying attention or staying awake. 

In contrast, from a constructivist understanding it would be helpful to alter the activities the student is doing. In the case study it says that Luke has shut down and is not engaged in learning. This could be because he is not involved in creating or constructing his own knowledge. This link contains ideas for constructivist lesson plans for various age levels. 

Behaviorism would be helpful in teaching the student the behavior that is desired, while constructivism would help engage Luke. In this case it may be easier and less disruptive for a teacher to employ a behavioristic model for changing behavior. The constructivist model would allow for Luke to be more integrated into the classroom. However, it would be much more difficult to do. 

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

PLE post 7 EI question

(8.2) The student for whom you are interpreting must complete an activity that requires him to solve a complex problem with a partner. Rather than collaborating with his partner, your student asks that you just tell him and his partner the answer. How would you re-direct this student and encourage him to work with his partner and persist in the task?

I can see how this type of situation may be intimidating or uncomfortable for the deaf student. However, this would be no excuse for the deaf student because being to work with others is an important skill to have whether the student is deaf or hearing. I would remind the student that he must do his own work, and that I am there only to help him communicate. One suggestion that I would give the student's is to start by making sure they both understand the assignment and agree on what needs to be done. It would also be imperitive that the students ask questions of each other so they can find out what prior knowledge exists. 
This link is to pamphlet put out by North Dakota School for the Deaf about the roles of the interpreter, teacher, and student in a mainstream classroom situation.